Development and Validation of High Performance Thin Layer Chromatography for the Estimation of Ziprasidone in Capsule Dosage Form

 

Patel A. B.1* and Patel S. G.2

1 Kalol institute of pharmacy college, Kalol, Gujarat, India

2Baroque Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd, Khambhat, Anand, Gujarat, India

*Corresponding Author E-mail: adi.pharma@yahoo.com

 

ABSTRACT:

A new simple, sensitive and precise high performance thin layer chromatographic method has been developed for estimation of Ziprasidone in capsule dosage form. In this method pre coated silica gel 60 GF 254 TLC plate was used as stationary phase and the chromatogram was developed using Toluene: methanol (80:20) (v/v) as mobile phase. Ziprasidone showed Rf values at 0.41 ± 0.2. The plate was scanned at 190-360nm and quantified at nm using Camag TLC Scanner. The linear concentration 400 – 2200 ng / band for ziprasidone. The percentage recovery for Ziprasidone was found to be 99.63%. The limit of detection and limit of quantitation was 6.65 ng/band, 20.14 ng/ band for Ziprasidone respectively. The method is validated as per ICH guidelines.

 

KEYWORDS: Ziprasodone, HPTLC

 


INTRODUCTION:

Ziprasidone1,2 (5-[2-[4-(1, 2-benzothiazol-3-yl) piperazin-1-yl] ethyl]-6-Chloro-1, 3- dihydroindol-2- One) is the atypical antipsychotic (or second generation) approved for treatment of schizophrenia. Ziprasidone3 is indicated for the treatment of schizophrenia. Ziprasidone is indicated for the treatment of acute manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar disorder, with or without psychotic features .Literature survey reveals individual determination and validation of Ziprasidone by, Zone electrophoresis4, spectrophotometry5, RPHPLC, LC-MSMS, LC-MS methods has been developed. To our Knowledge no article related to HPTLC method has been reported in literature.

 

Ziprasidone

 

The aim of present work is to develop an accurate, specific, repeatable, simple method foe determination of Ziprasidone in capsule dosage form as well as pure drug.6The proposed method was validated as per ICH guidelines.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Instrument: CAMAG HPTLC instrument was used in this method. CAMAG HPTLC is equipped with CAMAG TLC scanner-3, Linomate V Automatic sample applicator controlled by WIN CATS software (1.4.3 version). Aluminum packed silica Gel 60 F254 HPTLC plates (20 X 10cm, layer thickness 0.2mm, E.MERCK).

 

Reagent and chemicals:

Ziprasidone was received as gift samples from Zydus Cadila, Ahmadabad, India .All chemicals and reagents used were purchased form Merck chemicals Corporation Ltd. Mumbai, India. The drug sample in tablet dosage form, were procured from the market. [Zypsydone (Sun Pharma)]. Label claim for Ziprasidone were 20 mg. All other reagents used were of analytical grade for chromatographic method.

 

Optimized chromatographic condition:

Stationary phase: Pre-coated silica gel 60 F254 Aluminum plates (20x10cm)

Mobile phase: Toluene :methanol (80:20) (v/v)

Chamber saturation: 20 minutes

Development distance: 75mm

Development time: 15 minutes

Relative temperature: 25 ±2˚C

Relative Humidity: 44-49%

Detection wavelength (mm): 190-360nm

Distance between two tracks: 10 mm

 

Preparation of calibration curve:

To construct calibration curve 4, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20 and 22 µL of ziprasidone working solution (100 µg/mL) (Equivalent to 400, 800, 1000, 1600, and 2000, 2200 ng / band) were applied to three plates. The plates were developed and scanned at 190 and 360 nm. and peak areas were recorded for ziprasidone. Linear regression data for the calibration plots (n= 3) are illustrated in fig. no1 and 2, table no 1.

 

Fig 1. Chromatogram of Ziprasidone

 

Fig.2 Calibration curve of Ziprasidone

 

Table 1: Linear regression data for the calibration curve for Ziprazidone.

Parameter

Observation

Linearity range

400-2200ng/Band

Correlation coefficient ®

0.99988

Slope

4.0173

Intercept

2648.6

 

Analysis of Commercial Formulation:

Twenty capsules were weighed and the average weight was calculated. A quantity of mixed contents of 20 capsules equivalent to 25 mg of ziprasidone was accurately weighed and transferred in to 25 ml volumetric flask. 1 mL of formic acid was added to dissolve the content and then 10 mL for methanol was added to the solution and was sonicated for 15 min at room temperature. The solution was diluted up to the mark with methanol to furnish the sample stock solution (1 mg/mL).The solution was filtered through Whatman filter paper and 10 mL was transferred to a 100 mL volumetric flask and diluted up to the mark with methanol to furnish sample stock dilution (100 µg/mL). Sample solution 10 µL was applied to the plate with standard solutions. The plate was developed and scanned under the optimized conditions described above. Peak areas were recorded and the amount of ziprasidone in the formulation was determined by use of the Calibration curve as shown in table 2.

 

Table 2: Recovery data of Ziprazidone

Concentration (ng/band)

Intra-day precision

Inter-day precision

Mean area (AU)

RSD (%)

Mean area (AU)

RSD (%)

400

4251.17

0.18

4250.59

0.20

1000

6665.50

0.09

6665.21

0.09

2200

11434.43

0.07

11435.27

0.07

 

Application of sample:

The TLC plates were pre-washed with methanol and activated by keeping at 115°C for about 30 minutes. Aliquots were applied on the precoated silica gel G60 F254 TLC plate. Samples were spotted in the form of bands of width 10 mm with Hamilton microlitre syringe on the pre-coated silica gel 60 F254 plate (20X10 cm). Slit dimension was kept at 6 x 0.45mm. The distance between bands was 10mm. From the peak area the amount of ziprasidone in formulation was calculated using the calibration graph.

 

RESULT AND DISCUSSION:

The method was validated by establishing linearity, accuracy, inter day and intra day precision of measurement of sample application. The limit of detection and limit of quantification were also determined.

 

Linearity calibration curve:

Calibration curve was found to be linear in the range of 400 – 2200 ng / band for Ziprasidone. Five concentration points were assayed in triplicate. Ziprasidone showed good linearity in the tested range. The regression co-efficient (R2) value for Ziprasidone was found to be 0.9988 .

 

Accuracy:

Recovery study was carried out for the accuracy parameter. The study was carried out at three levels. To the powdered formulation, the standard drug Ziprasidone were added 80%, 100%, 120% levels, dilutions were made, and analyzed by the method. The % recovery and % RSD were calculated, and found to be within the limit as shown in table no.2


Table 3: Summary of the Validation parameter.


 

Specificity:

There was no interference from sample placebo and peak purity of Ziprasidone. It showed that developed method was specific for the analysis of Ziprasidone in capsule dosage form as shown in fig.3

 

Fig.3 Specificity of test and standard drug of Ziprasidone.

 

Precision:

Intra-day assay precision was found by analysis of standard drug at three times on the same day. Inter-day assay precision was carried out using the standard drug at two different days, and % RSD was calculated. The RSD was found to be less than 2 for both inter-day and intra-day assay precision.

 

Summary of all the Validation parameter are shown in Table no 1 the determined validation parameters are in the acceptable ranges. And result of Marketed formulation is shown in table no 3.

 

CONCLUSION:

The proposed method is simple, accurate, cost effective, less time consuming and the statistical analysis proved that the method is reproducible and efficient for the estimation of Ziprasidone as bulk drugs and in pharmaceutical dosage forms without any interference from the excipients.

 

REFERENCE:

[1] Lazo, J. S. & Parker, K.  “Goodman & Gilman’s the Pharmacological basis of Therapeutics”. United state of America: McGraw-Hill Companies. 2006.

[2] Cada, D. J. “Ziprasidone Drugs review from the formulary”. The Hospital Pharmacy. 2001, 36(6), 645-656.

[3] Kleyman, E., Rozenfeld, V. “Ziprasidone: Overview of a new atypical Antipsychotic. Drug Forecast. 2001, 63(4), 69-74.

[4] Farina, C., Kremser, L., Raggi M. A., & Kenndler, E. “Determination of Ziprasidone in pharmaceutical formulations by capillary zone electrophoresis”. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2008,46, 471–476.

[5] Srinubabau, G. Sudha rani, B., Seshagiri Rao, J.V.L.N. “Spectrophotometric Determination of Ziprasidone in Pharmaceutical Formulations” E-Journal of Chemistry, 2006, 3 (10), 9-12.

[6] ICH Harmonized Tripartile Guideline Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology Q2 (R1), International Conference on Harmonization, Geneva, Switzerland. Nov. 2005

  

 

 

Received on 06.11.2010               Modified on 28.11.2010

Accepted on 06.12.2010           © AJRC All right reserved

Asian J. Research Chem. 4(2): February 2011; Page 203-205